Skip to content
NOWCAST 비바카지노 Viva Morning News Sunday
Watch on Demand
코인카지노

Trump is consistently inconsistent on abortion and reproductive rights

Trump is consistently inconsistent on abortion and reproductive rights
It was *** right that we've had for 50 years. It's crazy to think that you can take it back right away. Who does that? Donna Ross is voting to protect abortion rights. Candy Perdue is too. Everybody on that issue I believe has the right to decide what they want and what they can live with. Beyond that, their views diverge sharply here in battleground Arizona where Ross is supporting Kamala Harris. She's so dynamic and Perdue is backing Donald Trump. You darn right. I am the scrambled politics of abortion are at the center of the first presidential race since the Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade. The fight has been an anthem of Harris's candidacy. So Arizona, we need to fight this battle on every front and in this election, you have the chance on the state level to vote. Yes. On proposition one third. Yet, it's far from certain whether proposition 139 *** measure to enshrine abortion rights in the state constitution will give her *** definite edge. Abortion and immigration are colliding in Arizona like few other battlegrounds with both issues. Literally on the ballot. Proposition 314 would make immigration violations. *** state crime, virtually no money has been spent on ads compared to abortion which dominates the airwaves. You can end Arizona's abortion ban by voting. Yes. On 139 it's something that resonates with independents, with Democrats, with Republicans. Laura Dent helped gather more than 800,000 signatures from Arizona voters to put abortion rights on the ballot as volunteers go door to door three weeks before the election, Myra Rodriguez has deployed an RV to spread the word against the measure. We don't come with the amount of money. The other side does *** former clinic manager for Planned Parenthood Rodriguez now warns women against abortion. She's voting for Trump, but with little enthusiasm, I always tell people that Jesus is on the ballot. You have to choose always the lesser of two evils and the lesser of two evils is to me, it's Trump four years ago, Trump lost Arizona by 10,457 votes out of more than 3.3 million cast. One of his narrowest defeats David Tapia sat on the sidelines in that election but has no plans of doing so again. He's 42 born and raised in Arizona and used his classic cars to entice others to register to vote. Trump drove you to be more politically aware, 100% Trump's *** popular guy. So whether you like it or not, you're going to open your phone and you're going to see politics. The more. He saw the former president over the past four years. He said the less he liked, he plans to vote for Harris looking at both sides. I mean, I'll be honest, I'm not *** supporter of Trump, I'm just not, he's been studying state races too, including the abortion measure. He plans to support my man. No one's ever told me what to do and I believe that women have the right to make the decisions on their own bodies. Whether Tapia's views are widely held or the exception will help determine the outcome in Arizona.
코인카지노
Trump is consistently inconsistent on abortion and reproductive rights
Donald Trump has had a tough time finding a consistent message to questions about abortion and reproductive rights.The former president has constantly shifted his stances or offered vague, contradictory and at times nonsensical answers to questions on an issue that has become a major vulnerability for Republicans in this year's election. Trump has been trying to win over voters, especially women, skeptical about his views, especially after he nominated three Supreme Court justices who helped overturn the nationwide right to abortion two years ago.The latest example came this week when the Republican presidential nominee said some abortion laws are 맥스카지노too tough맥스카지노 and would be 맥스카지노redone.맥스카지노맥스카지노It맥스카지노s going to be redone,맥스카지노 he said during a Fox News town hall that aired Wednesday. 맥스카지노They맥스카지노re going to, you맥스카지노re going to, you end up with a vote of the people. They맥스카지노re too tough, too tough. And those are going to be redone because already there맥스카지노s a movement in those states.맥스카지노Trump did not specify if he meant he would take some kind of action if he wins in November, and he did not say which states or laws he was talking about. He did not elaborate on what he meant by 맥스카지노redone.맥스카지노He also seemed to be contradicting his own stance when referencing the strict abortion bans passed in Republican-controlled states since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Trump recently said he would vote against a constitutional amendment on the Florida ballot that is aimed at overturning the state맥스카지노s six-week abortion ban. That decision came after he had criticized the law as too harsh.Trump has shifted between boasting about nominating the justices who helped strike down federal protections for abortion and trying to appear more neutral. It's been an attempt to thread the divide between his base of anti-abortion supporters and the majority of Americans who support abortion rights.About 6 in 10 Americans think their state should generally allow a person to obtain a legal abortion if they don맥스카지노t want to be pregnant for any reason, according to a July poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Voters in seven states, including some conservative ones, have either protected abortion rights or defeated attempts to restrict them in statewide votes over the past two years.Video below: A Conversation with Elizabeth Carr, the First Person Born Via IVF in the U.S.Trump also has been repeating the narrative that he returned the question of abortion rights to states, even though voters do not have a direct say on that or any other issue in about half the states. This is particularly true for those living in the South, where Republican-controlled legislatures, many of which have been gerrymandered to give the GOP disproportionate power, have enacted some of the strictest abortion bans since Roe v. Wade was overturned.Currently, 13 states have banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy, while four more ban it after six weeks 맥스카지노 before many women know they맥스카지노re pregnant.Meanwhile, anti-abortion groups and their Republican allies in state governments are using an array of strategies to counter proposed ballot initiatives in at least eight states this year.Here's a breakdown of Trump's fluctuating stances on reproductive rights.Flip-flopping on FloridaOn Tuesday, Trump claimed some abortion laws are 맥스카지노too tough맥스카지노 and would be 맥스카지노redone.맥스카지노But in August, Trump said he would vote against a state ballot measure that is attempting to repeal the six-week abortion ban passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.That came a day after he seemed to indicate he would vote in favor of the measure. Trump previously called Florida's six-week ban a 맥스카지노terrible mistake맥스카지노 and too extreme. In an April Time magazine interview, Trump repeated that he 맥스카지노thought six weeks is too severe.맥스카지노Trump on vetoing a national banTrump맥스카지노s latest flip-flopping has involved his views on a national abortion ban.During the Oct. 1 vice presidential debate, Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social that he would veto a national abortion ban: "Everyone knows I would not support a federal abortion ban, under any circumstances, and would, in fact, veto it.맥스카지노This came just weeks after Trump repeatedly declined to say during the presidential debate with Democrat Kamala Harris whether he would veto a national abortion ban if he were elected.Trump맥스카지노s running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, said in an interview with NBC News before the presidential debate that Trump would veto a ban. In response to debate moderators prompting him about Vance맥스카지노s statement, Trump said: 맥스카지노I didn맥스카지노t discuss it with JD, in all fairness. And I don맥스카지노t mind if he has a certain view, but I don맥스카지노t think he was speaking for me.맥스카지노맥스카지노Pro-choice맥스카지노 to 15-week banTrump맥스카지노s shifting abortion policy stances began when the former reality TV star and developer started flirting with running for office.He once called himself 맥스카지노very pro-choice.맥스카지노 But before becoming president, Trump said he 맥스카지노would indeed support a ban,맥스카지노 according to his book 맥스카지노The America We Deserve,맥스카지노 which was published in 2000.In his first year as president, he said he was 맥스카지노pro-life with exceptions맥스카지노 but also said 맥스카지노there has to be some form of punishment맥스카지노 for women seeking abortions 맥스카지노 a position he quickly reversed.At the 2018 annual March for Life, Trump voiced support for a federal ban on abortion on or after 20 weeks of pregnancy.More recently, Trump suggested in March that he might support a national ban on abortions around 15 weeks before announcing that he instead would leave the matter to the states.Views on abortion pills, prosecuting womenIn the Time interview, Trump said it should be left up to the states to decide whether to prosecute women for abortions or to monitor women's pregnancies.맥스카지노The states are going to make that decision,맥스카지노 Trump said. 맥스카지노The states are going to have to be comfortable or uncomfortable, not me.맥스카지노Democrats have seized on the comments he made in 2016, saying 맥스카지노there has to be some form of punishment맥스카지노 for women who have abortions.Trump also declined to comment on access to the abortion pill mifepristone, claiming that he has 맥스카지노pretty strong views맥스카지노 on the matter. He said he would make a statement on the issue, but it never came.Trump responded similarly when asked about his views on the Comstock Act, a 19th century law that has been revived by anti-abortion groups seeking to block the mailing of mifepristone.Views on IVF Trump has offered contradictory statements on in vitro fertilization.During the Fox News town hall, which was taped Tuesday, Trump declared that he is 맥스카지노the father of IVF,맥스카지노 despite acknowledging during his answer that he needed an explanation of IVF in February after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law.Trump said he instructed Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., to 맥스카지노explain IVF very quickly맥스카지노 to him in the aftermath of the ruling.As concerns over access to fertility treatments rose, Trump pledged to promote IVF by requiring health insurance companies or the federal government to pay for it. Such a move would be at odds with the actions of much of his own party.Even as the Republican Party has tried to create a national narrative that it is receptive to IVF, these messaging efforts have been undercut by GOP state lawmakers, Republican-dominated courts and anti-abortion leaders within the party맥스카지노s ranks, as well as opposition to legislative attempts to protect IVF access.

Donald Trump has had a tough time finding a consistent message to questions about abortion and reproductive rights.

The former president has constantly shifted his stances or offered vague, contradictory and at times nonsensical answers to questions on an issue that has become a major vulnerability for Republicans in this year's election. Trump has been trying to win over voters, especially women, skeptical about his views, especially after he nominated three Supreme Court justices who helped overturn the nationwide right to abortion two years ago.

코인카지노

The latest example came this week when the Republican presidential nominee said some abortion laws are 맥스카지노too tough맥스카지노 and would be 맥스카지노redone.맥스카지노

맥스카지노It맥스카지노s going to be redone,맥스카지노 he said during a Fox News town hall that aired Wednesday. 맥스카지노They맥스카지노re going to, you맥스카지노re going to, you end up with a vote of the people. They맥스카지노re too tough, too tough. And those are going to be redone because already there맥스카지노s a movement in those states.맥스카지노

Trump did not specify if he meant he would take some kind of action if he wins in November, and he did not say which states or laws he was talking about. He did not elaborate on what he meant by 맥스카지노redone.맥스카지노

He also seemed to be contradicting his own stance when referencing the strict abortion bans passed in Republican-controlled states since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Trump recently said he would vote against a constitutional amendment on the Florida ballot that is aimed at overturning the state맥스카지노s six-week abortion ban. That decision came after he had criticized the law as too harsh.

Trump has shifted between boasting about nominating the justices who helped strike down federal protections for abortion and trying to appear more neutral. It's been an attempt to thread the divide between his base of anti-abortion supporters and the majority of Americans who support abortion rights.

About 6 in 10 Americans think their state should generally allow a person to obtain a legal abortion if they don맥스카지노t want to be pregnant for any reason, according to a July poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Voters in seven states, including some conservative ones, have either protected abortion rights or defeated attempts to restrict them in statewide votes over the past two years.

Video below: A Conversation with Elizabeth Carr, the First Person Born Via IVF in the U.S.

Trump also has been repeating the narrative that he returned the question of abortion rights to states, even though voters do not have a direct say on that or any other issue in about half the states. This is particularly true for those living in the South, where Republican-controlled legislatures, many of which have been gerrymandered to give the GOP disproportionate power, have enacted some of the strictest abortion bans since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

Currently, 13 states have banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy, while four more ban it after six weeks 맥스카지노 before many women know they맥스카지노re pregnant.

Meanwhile, anti-abortion groups and their Republican allies in state governments are using an array of strategies to counter proposed ballot initiatives in at least eight states this year.

Here's a breakdown of Trump's fluctuating stances on reproductive rights.

Flip-flopping on Florida

On Tuesday, Trump claimed some abortion laws are 맥스카지노too tough맥스카지노 and would be 맥스카지노redone.맥스카지노

But in August, Trump said he would vote against a state ballot measure that is attempting to repeal the six-week abortion ban passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.

That came a day after he seemed to indicate he would vote in favor of the measure. Trump previously called Florida's six-week ban a 맥스카지노terrible mistake맥스카지노 and too extreme. In an April Time magazine interview, Trump repeated that he 맥스카지노thought six weeks is too severe.맥스카지노

Trump on vetoing a national ban

Trump맥스카지노s latest flip-flopping has involved his views on a national abortion ban.

During the Oct. 1 vice presidential debate, Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social that he would veto a national abortion ban: "Everyone knows I would not support a federal abortion ban, under any circumstances, and would, in fact, veto it.맥스카지노

This came just weeks after Trump repeatedly declined to say during the presidential debate with Democrat Kamala Harris whether he would veto a national abortion ban if he were elected.

Trump맥스카지노s running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, said in an interview with NBC News before the presidential debate that Trump would veto a ban. In response to debate moderators prompting him about Vance맥스카지노s statement, Trump said: 맥스카지노I didn맥스카지노t discuss it with JD, in all fairness. And I don맥스카지노t mind if he has a certain view, but I don맥스카지노t think he was speaking for me.맥스카지노

맥스카지노Pro-choice맥스카지노 to 15-week ban

Trump맥스카지노s shifting abortion policy stances began when the former reality TV star and developer started flirting with running for office.

He once called himself 맥스카지노very pro-choice.맥스카지노 But before becoming president, Trump said he 맥스카지노would indeed support a ban,맥스카지노 according to his book 맥스카지노The America We Deserve,맥스카지노 which was published in 2000.

In his first year as president, he said he was 맥스카지노pro-life with exceptions맥스카지노 but also said 맥스카지노there has to be some form of punishment맥스카지노 for women seeking abortions 맥스카지노 a position he quickly reversed.

At the 2018 annual March for Life, Trump voiced support for a federal ban on abortion on or after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

More recently, Trump suggested in March that he might support a national ban on abortions around 15 weeks before announcing that he instead would leave the matter to the states.

Views on abortion pills, prosecuting women

In the Time interview, Trump said it should be left up to the states to decide whether to prosecute women for abortions or to monitor women's pregnancies.

맥스카지노The states are going to make that decision,맥스카지노 Trump said. 맥스카지노The states are going to have to be comfortable or uncomfortable, not me.맥스카지노

Democrats have seized on the comments he made in 2016, saying 맥스카지노there has to be some form of punishment맥스카지노 for women who have abortions.

Trump also declined to comment on access to the abortion pill mifepristone, claiming that he has 맥스카지노pretty strong views맥스카지노 on the matter. He said he would make a statement on the issue, but it never came.

Trump responded similarly when asked about his views on the Comstock Act, a 19th century law that has been revived by anti-abortion groups seeking to block the mailing of mifepristone.

Views on IVF

Trump has offered contradictory statements on in vitro fertilization.

During the Fox News town hall, which was taped Tuesday, Trump declared that he is 맥스카지노the father of IVF,맥스카지노 despite acknowledging during his answer that he needed an explanation of IVF in February after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law.

Trump said he instructed Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., to 맥스카지노explain IVF very quickly맥스카지노 to him in the aftermath of the ruling.

As concerns over access to fertility treatments rose, Trump pledged to promote IVF by requiring health insurance companies or the federal government to pay for it. Such a move would be at odds with the actions of much of his own party.

Even as the Republican Party has tried to create a national narrative that it is receptive to IVF, these messaging efforts have been undercut by GOP state lawmakers, Republican-dominated courts and anti-abortion leaders within the party맥스카지노s ranks, as well as opposition to legislative attempts to protect IVF access.