'??? ??? ???' ???? ? ???? (China's Northeast Project based on An Unificative Multiracial State)

??? ????? ?? ??????? ???? ????? ??? ????? ??? ????? ?????. ??? ??, ??? ????? ??? ??? ??, ??, ????? ????(�������)? ????? ???? ????? ????? ??? ??? ?? ��??? ??�� ? ??? ??? ????? ??? ��??? ??????��??? ??? ???? ??? ?? ???? ? ???.
??? ????? ????? ?? ??? ??? ????? ??? ????? ????? ??? ??? ???. ??? ???? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ??? ???? ??? ??? ??? ??? ?????. ??? ?? ?? ��??? ??? ???�� ??? ????? ??? ??. ?? ??? ????? ??? ?? ??, ??? ?? ???? ???? ?????. ?? ?????? ?? ??? ???? ??? ????? ???? ?? ???. ?? ?? ???? ??? ?? ????? ???? ???? ??.
? ??? ??? ?? ????? ???. ??, ��??? ??? ???��? ???? ????? ????? ?? ??? ???? ?? ??? ???? ??????? ????, ??, ??? ???? ???? ???, ???, ??? ��??? ?????��?? ???? ???? ?? ??? ??? ???? ??, ????? ??? ??? ��??? ??? ???��? ????? ?? ????? ?? ?? ??? ??? ????. ?? ??? ???? ??? ???? ?? ??? ??? ???? ???? ???? ??? ? ??.

It is as follows. Firstly must defend break away from a minority group in china. Second, to cut off the link between a minority group and kuajie��minzu(�������), it was making new history through alternative that is (called) a ��t��ngy�� du��m��nz�� Gu��ji����(�yһ���������) as part of history work used a slogan 'one china'.
While china carried out a minority group policy called ��carrots and sticks��. but the china government feels limit to control by a minority group policy only. She requires the new alternate to firm herself control.
It is in the establishment of the national identity as a form that is a 't��ngy�� du��m��nz�� Gu��ji��'. This come from the three aspect on a crisis management of domestic and foreign, a crackdown, and a system support. Especially, It is fundamentally intended to erect the national identity and to block the segregation of a minority group. China finally proved her national identity and proceeded by the name of g��ngch��ng(����).
This paper is summarized as follows. First, with a analytical framework of a ��t��ngy�� du��m��nz�� Gu��ji����, examines how apply and set up in deal with the history problem of a minority group and the national relation.
Second, What��s the difference by applying a analytical framework of a ��t��ngy�� du��m��nz�� Gu��ji���� to an history of Gochosun(�ų��r), Koguryo(�߾���), and Parhae(����)? Third, was The problem to apply of a ��t��ngy�� du��m��nz�� Gu��ji���� theory' that china and her academic insisted indeed justified? I try to search a close analysis over this. As stated earlier, a analytical framework of a ��t��ngy�� du��m��nz�� Gu��ji���� is able to expect availability of dealing with some g��ngch��ng and a minority group matter.