·QדՄԒ  î›r?? ·´‘ªÕZ? ???? Õ„Ô’˜Ë×R? ?? ³x¾¿ (Study on Discourse Marker as a Responding to the Praising Discourse)

This study aims to investigate the difference between the two groups - Korean and Korean Chinese in terms of the discourse marker as a reaction to the praising discourse. The way how they accept was as follows.
Regarding the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for causality, both groups showed "thank you" at a high rate of frequency which means they accept it willingly.
In terms of the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for greeting, "thank you" was at the higher frequency in Korean collage students but Korean-Chinese collage students reacted saying "really" at the higher frequency which showed indirect way of accepting it. Koran college students accepted it willingly since they regards it as showing an interest to the counterpart. In case of Korean-Chinese often uses discourse marker for retaining social relationship with the counterpart and for reconfirming it.
Regarding the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for flattery, Korean college students reacted like "thank you", "not really" with high frequencies which means they accept it with passive and heavily upon his mind.
On the other hand, the Korean-Chinese illustrated "not really", "don"t say that" with high frequencies. This because Korean college students are not willingly take the praising discourse not to make the counterpart displeased, they take it indirectly but Korean-chinese college students exposed refusal response and attitude.
For making the communication better, the listener should respond with speech act that the culture of the speaker is expecting and it is important and needed an attitude learning and accepting the culture of the listener.

This study aims to investigate the difference between the two groups - Korean and Korean Chinese in terms of the discourse marker as a reaction to the praising discourse. The way how they accept was as follows.
Regarding the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for causality, both groups showed "thank you" at a high rate of frequency which means they accept it willingly.
In terms of the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for greeting, "thank you" was at the higher frequency in Korean collage students but Korean-Chinese collage students reacted saying "really" at the higher frequency which showed indirect way of accepting it. Koran college students accepted it willingly since they regards it as showing an interest to the counterpart. In case of Korean-Chinese often uses discourse marker for retaining social relationship with the counterpart and for reconfirming it.
Regarding the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for flattery, Korean college students reacted like "thank you", "not really" with high frequencies which means they accept it with passive and heavily upon his mind.
On the other hand, the Korean-Chinese illustrated "not really", "don"t say that" with high frequencies. This because Korean college students are not willingly take the praising discourse not to make the counterpart displeased, they take it indirectly but Korean-chinese college students exposed refusal response and attitude.
For making the communication better, the listener should respond with speech act that the culture of the speaker is expecting and it is important and needed an attitude learning and accepting the culture of the listener.