�Ͽ� 3�� ����? ??? ��� �ĸ? ?? ?? (A Study on the Medial of the Third Division H��k��uh��)

???(1985:70-71)? ??(�Ͽ�) 3?(��) ??(����)? *i?w(jw)? ??? ?? ??(���) ??(�ĸ)? ??? ?? 3? ?? *iw?? ??? ??? ?? ??. ????? ?? 3? ??? ??? *iw? ?? *wi? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ?? ?? ???? ?? ??? ??? ????? ??? ????, ?? 3? ??? wi? ??? ??? ???, ?? ??? ?? ? ��?�? ???, ��? 3����? ?? ??? ???? ?????. ?? ?? ?? 3? ??? ??? wi? ?????? ??, ?? ?? [y]? wi?? ????? ??? ???.

The medial of cu��k��uh�� [y] has been thought to have originated from the medial of the 3 rd division h��k��uh�� *iw, since Karlgren reconstructed the medial of the 3 rd division h��k��uh�� as *jw. Karlgren considered the order of the medial of the 3 rd division h��k��uh�� to be iw, not wi, because in the Korean pronunciations of ��, ��(kiun), ��(iun) the medial was i?(j) and besides, the Middle Chinese of ��, �� was *kiwei, *k?iwei, but the Korean pronunciation of ��, �� is kiu, after the following parts of w were gone. However, in Sino-Vietnamese the order of the medial of the 3 rd division h��k��uh�� is ui, not iu. Therefore, there is an argument that the order of the medial of the 3 rd division h��k��uh�� should be corrected into wi. In this paper, I tried to find the evidence that the order of the medial of the 3 rd division h��k��uh�� should be corrected into *wi in Vietnamese pronunciation, Korean pronunciation and Chinese pronunciation of Chinese characters. As a result, it was concluded that the order of the medial of the 3 rd division h��k��uh�� should be reconstructed as *wi, and the vowel [y] of modern Mandarin came from *wi, not *iw.