???? ???? ??? ??? (The Transition from Unauthentic to Authentic Language)

? ??? ????? ??? ??, ? ? ?? ??? ?? ??? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?? ? ??? ???? ?????. ?? ?? ????? ��??? ??��? ?? ????? ???? ?? ??? ????? ????? ??? ???? ? ?? ??? ��???? ????��? ?? ?????. ???? ?? ?? ?????? ????, ��??��? ?? ?? ???? ??? ??? ???? ??? ???? ?????. ??? ???? ??? ??? ????? ??, ??? ???? ??? ?? ????? ??? ? ??. ?? ???? ??, ?? ?? ???? ?? ??? ???? ???? ?? ????? ?? ????. ????? ?????? ????? ??? ???? ???? ??? ???? ???? ???? ???? ? ?? ??? ?????. ??? ? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ??? ??? ?? ??? ???? ???? ????. ??? ??? ??? ???? ??? ???? ??? ?? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ? ??.

This article attempts to show that an individual cannot lose their freedom even in publicity by drawing on Heidegger��s original language, that is, poetic language. For this work, I focused on the discussion of unauthenticity and authenticity in Heidegger��s Sein und Zeit and examined the language of poetry as an authentic language through Unterwegs zur Sprache. First of all, Da-sein is, in an unauthentic way, snooping around curiously about idle talk, which is spread widely by Them. However, Da-sein can make a transition to authenticity through the sudden attack of anxiety, the anticipation of death, and the silent voice of conscience. This is possible because of the ontological closeness and solidarity between Da-sein and Being. Thanks to the transition to authenticity, Being itself appears to Da-sein, and in response to it, Da-sein becomes capable of poetic speaking in its authentic language. Such poetic speaking is speaking that acknowledges the uniqueness of the very existence of others as well as one��s own. Therefore, this manner of speaking is not only a language that conveys freedom to individuals, but also a language of harmony.