Äϱ±‡ø•r´úÕ“? ²³º£ Diaspora (The Theory of the Period of South & North Countries and Balhae Diaspora)

? ?? ??????? ?? ??? ?? ?? ??? ????. ?? ??????? ??????? ?? ??? ??????, ??? ??? ?? ??? ??? ??? ?? ??. ? ??? ??? ????, ??? ??? ????? ??? ?? ??. ??? ? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ?? ???? ?????? ? ???? ?? ??????? ?? ??? ??? ?? ??? ??? ????. ?????? ??????? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ??? ????? ??? ????? ??? ?? ????? ??? ???. ???? ?????? ??? ?? ???? ?? ??? ??????? ????? ???? ? ? ?? ???. ?? ??? ???? ??? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????? ???.
??? ? ?? ??????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ???? ?? ???? ? ??. ??? ???? ????? ?? ????? ??? ??????? ????? ??? ????, ????? ??? ???? ??????. ????? ?? ??? ?? ?? ? ???? ??? ???? Diaspora(?????) ??? ???? ???. ??? ? ??? ?? ?? ??? ??? ?? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ?????. ??????? ?? ????, ??? ?????? ?? ???? ?? ?? ???? Diaspora? ???? ?? ??? ?????. ?? ? ???? ????? ?, ??????? ????? ?? ???? ??? ???, ??? ??? ??? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ? ? ?? ???. ?? ???? ?? ??? ?? ???? ??? ????? ???? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ? ? ??.
?? ??? ?????? ?? ??? ??? ??? ? ?? ??? ??. ? ???? ??????? ???? ??? ?? ???? ???? ? ??? ?? ?? ??? ???? ??? ????, ??? ? ?? ??? ??? ???? ???. ????? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ? ??, ???? ?? ?? ??? ??? ? ?? ??? ?????? ??.

Until now, ¡®The Theory of the Period of South and North Countries(Silla and Balhae)¡®(Äϱ±‡ø•r´úÕ“) and the study on the fall of Balhae (²³º£) are used to consider as two distinct types. A is the study of the perspective how Balhae can be seen, B is the study of specific historical facts which can be regarded as Balhae topic. However, in current research, the two topics are not covered together. This is due to the fact that the former which is determined as specifically history of history and the latter which is distinguished as the study of history are treated as disparately.
However, these two types are seen as they cannot be divided with dualistic distinction which is simple history of history and the study of history. The meaning of¡® The Theory of the Period of South and North Countries¡¯that the histoy of Balhae kingdom emphasizes and the study of the fall of Balhae can be considered as they are related together.
¡®The Theory of the Period of South and North Countries¡¯which took form through Lyu, Dug-gong (ÁøµÃ¹§) is the viewpoint which can actively claim that Balhae is a member of Korean history. This argument led to the action and the ideology of the independence movement during the Japanese Ruling Era. But, after 20th century(era of division), currently ¡®The Theory of the Period of South and North Countries¡¯seems to be emphasized as the model of unification between the two Koreas. Therefore, today we are dealing with transformational theory of the Period of South and North Countries. Although it is obvious that Balhae is the main agent of Korean history, ¡®the South and North Dynasties¡¯(Äϱ±‡ø; Balhae and Silla) is used to perceived as overlapping the division of South and North Korea which is the division of adversarial political structure.
Recognition of times and interpretation of history can be led to the complementary comprehension. In this article, by comparing ¡®The Theory of the Period of South and North Countries¡¯and the comprehension of the fall of Balhae, there can be found the fact that both two types of the studies reveal limitation. Thus, not only can we have a new understanding of the essential meaning of¡® The Theory of the Period of South and North Countries¡¯, but also the understanding of the fall of the Balhae Dynasty as well.