��?? ?? ??��? ???? ?????? ?????? ??(�붨) (Nationalization of ��a nation without history�� and the Posit of Proletarian Nationalism)

? ????? ��????��? ��??????�� ???? ???? ��?(��)??????��? ??? ???? ??? ��??? ??�� ??? ????? ??? ?????? ??. ??? ????? ???? ????, ??, ???? ��??�� ??? ??? ??? ???? ??? ???? ???? ???. ?? ???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ��???��? ??? ???, ???? ��????��?? ???? ��??��? ??? ??? ????? ?? ??? ????. ?? ??????? ?????? ??? ? ???? ???? ??? ??? ????? ???? ??????? ???? ??? ��?�� ??? ???, ? ???? ??=????? ??? ?????. ?? ?????? ??? ??? ?? ??? ???? ??=?????? ???? ????? ???????? ?? ??? ?????. ??? ??? ????? ????? ???? ???? ????? ????? ???? ? ??? ????? ????? ???? ???? ???? ?? ??. ?? ?? ??? ??? ?? ??? ???? ????. ??? ?? ??? ???? ??? ??? ???, ??? ??? ??? ???? ????, ???? ??? ??? ? ?? ???? ??? ??????? ???? ????? ??? ??, ? ?????? ???? ??????? ???? ??? ???? ???? ???? ?? ????. ??? ??? ????? ??? ????? ?? ???? ??? ??? ?? ???? ???? ??????? ??????? ??? ? ??? ��???��? ????? ??? ????. ?? ? ?? ?? ?????? ??? ?? ??? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ?? ?? ??? ???? ??? ???? ??? ????? ?????? ?? ??? ???? ????? ??(�붨)? ???? ?????.

This article tries to examine the logic of ��new Marxism�� that occurs between Marx and Marx��s ��ism�� through the concept of Stalin��s nationalism translated from Japan. Kautsky, Renner, and Bauer��s theory of ��nation�� utilizing historical development stages constituted a global ethnology at the boundary between orthodoxy and heresy. In particular, in the process of developing from a tribe to a nation, it goes through an ��intermediate��, and there was a paradox that structured the logic that a ��nation�� that was eliminated from ��becoming a nation�� was created. Karutsky, who points out the limitations of the bourgeois national theory, which has been central to the development of the existing capitalist society, formed a new concept of the people led by the proletariat, and in this process, the logic of using the concept of language=national community arises. Following this, from a critical standpoint, Renner and Bauer reconstruct the concept of nation as a cultural community to overcome the limitation of language=national community. However, it, like Kautsky, explains the historical processes formed at the stage of development from tribe to nation, while neglecting the Jewish question. In particular, they take a stand against internationalism through the argument of the theory of nationalism. In this situation, Stalin established that language as a metaphor for domination and subjugation, territorial and regional issues, and that the proletariat should rise as a nation beyond the national concept centered on the bourgeois nation, and that proletariat It advocates for the peoples of the world to unite internationally and at the same time create a common language of the world. However, this was a logic built while forgetting the ambivalence that Kautsky��s concept of ethnic minority and nationalism in which ethnic groups were integrated around a region could be linked to nationalism. In particular, it was found that Stalin��s argument for the logic that an advanced nation among the proletariat should enlighten the backward proletarian nation or provide aid to a high-level culture showed that it was in the adjustment of Stalin��s nationalism in the ideology of the development stage theory.