PARTNER
๊ฒ€์ฆ๋œ ํŒŒํŠธ๋„ˆ ์ œํœด์‚ฌ ์ž๋ฃŒ

Cognitive Factors and Spoken Syntactic Development of L2 Korean Learners: Regularities and Variations (Cognitive Factors and Spoken Syntactic Development of L2 Korean Learners: Regularities and Variations)

30 ํŽ˜์ด์งฟ’
๊ธฐํƒ€ํŒŒ์ผ
์ตœ์ดˆ๋“ฑ๋ก์ผ 2025.05.24 ์ตœ์ข…์ ฟ’์ž‘์ผ 2017.06
30P ๋ฏธ๋้ฉ๋ณด๊ธฐ
Cognitive Factors and Spoken Syntactic Development of L2 Korean Learners: Regularities and Variations
  • ๋ฏธ๋้ฉ๋ณด๊ธฐ

    ์„œ์่ง์ •๋ต–

    ยท ๋ฐœํ–‰๊ธฐ๊ด€ : ํ•œ๊ตญ์‘์šฉ์–ธ์–ดํ•™ํšŒ
    ยท ์ˆ˜๋ก์ง€ ์ •๋ณด : ์‘์šฉ์–ธ์–ดํ•™ / 33๊ถŒ / 2ํ˜ธ / 107 ~ 136ํŽ˜์ด์งฟ’
    ยท ์ €์ž๋ช… : ๋ฐฑ์ค€์˜ค, ๊น€์˜์ฃผ, ์ด์„ ์ง„, ์˜ค์ง„ํฌ

    ์ดˆ๋ก

    In the present study, we examined regularities and variations of the syntactic structure of L2 Korean spoken by L2 learners along with their cognitive factors. The participants were 61 L2 learners of Korean whose L1s were English, Chinese, Japanese, and others; in addition, 30 native speakers of Korean were tested as the control group. In the study, we employed the letter span test, paired associates test, serial response test, visual memory test, spatial memory test, and phonological memory test to measure the participantsโ€™ executive functioning and working memory.
    A mini Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK) was conducted as an index of learnersโ€™ general linguistic proficiency, and spoken production was transcribed after participants watched a short video clip. The study applied the Pearson correlation coefficient to find out the relationship between the types of syntactic structures and the cognitive factors. The study showed three main results.
    First, each learnerโ€™s cognitive uniqueness produces variation of syntactic development. Second, general learning factors, including the period of learning and level of proficiency, produce regularities between learners. Lastly, the use of complex predicate forms seems to be an index of native-likeness, where learners with high statistical learning abilities used these forms more than others did.

    ์˜์–ด์ดˆ๋ก

    In the present study, we examined regularities and variations of the syntactic structure of L2 Korean spoken by L2 learners along with their cognitive factors. The participants were 61 L2 learners of Korean whose L1s were English, Chinese, Japanese, and others; in addition, 30 native speakers of Korean were tested as the control group. In the study, we employed the letter span test, paired associates test, serial response test, visual memory test, spatial memory test, and phonological memory test to measure the participantsโ€™ executive functioning and working memory.
    A mini Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK) was conducted as an index of learnersโ€™ general linguistic proficiency, and spoken production was transcribed after participants watched a short video clip. The study applied the Pearson correlation coefficient to find out the relationship between the types of syntactic structures and the cognitive factors. The study showed three main results.
    First, each learnerโ€™s cognitive uniqueness produces variation of syntactic development. Second, general learning factors, including the period of learning and level of proficiency, produce regularities between learners. Lastly, the use of complex predicate forms seems to be an index of native-likeness, where learners with high statistical learning abilities used these forms more than others did.

    ์ฐธ๊ณ ์ž๋ฃŒ

    ยท ์—†์Œ
  • ์ž์ฃผ๋ฌป๋Š”์งˆ๋ๅฉ์˜ ๋‹ต๋ณ€์„ ํ™•์ธํ•ด ์ฃผ์„ธ์š”

    ํ•ดํ”ผ์บ ํผ์Šค FAQ ๋”๋ณด๊ธฐ

    ๊ผญ ์•Œ์•„์ฃผ์„ธ์š”

    • ์ž๋ฃŒ์˜ ์ •๋ณด ๋ฐ ๋‚ด์šฉ์˜ ์ง„์‹ค์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ดํ”ผ์บ ํผ์Šค๋Š” ๋ณด์ฆํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•ด๋‹น ์ •๋ณด ๋ฐ ๊ฒŒ์‹œ๋ฌผ ์ €์ž‘๊ถŒ๊ณผ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ๋ฒ•์  ์ฑ…์ž„์€ ์ž๋ฃŒ ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
      ์ž๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๊ฒŒ์‹œ๋ฌผ ๋‚ด์šฉ์˜ ๋ถˆ๋ฒ•์  ์ด์šฉ, ๋ฌด๋‹จ ์ „์žฌโˆ™๋ฐฐํฌ๋Š” ๊ธˆ์ง€๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
      ์ €์ž‘๊ถŒ์นจํ•ด, ๋ช…์˜ˆํ›ผ์† ๋“ฑ ๋ถ„์Ÿ ์š”์†Œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ์‹œ ๊ณ ๊ฐ๋น„๋ฐ”์นด์ง€๋…ธ Viva์˜ ์ €์ž‘๊ถŒ์นจํ•ด ์‹ ๊ณ ๋น„๋ฐ”์นด์ง€๋…ธ Viva๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์ฃผ์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ”๋ž๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    • ํ•ดํ”ผ์บ ํผ์Šค๋Š” ๊ตฌ๋งค์ž์™ฟ’ ํŒ๋งค์ž ๋ชจ๋‘๊ฐ€ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ์„œ๋น„์Šค๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋„๋ก ๋…ธ๋ ฅํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์•„๋ž˜์˜ 4๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ž๋ฃŒํ™˜๋ถˆ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ผญ ํ™•์ธํ•ด์ฃผ์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ”๋ž๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
      ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ค๋ฅ˜ ์ค‘๋ณต์ž๋ฃŒ ์ €์ž‘๊ถŒ ์—†์Œ ์„ค๋ช…๊ณผ ์‹ค์ œ ๋‚ด์šฉ ๋ถˆ์ผ์น˜
      ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ๋‹ค์šด๋กœ๋“œ๊ฐ€ ์ œ๋Œ€๋กœ ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํŒŒ์ผํ˜•์‹์— ๋งž๋Š” ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์œผ๋กœ ์ •์ƒ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ž๋ฃŒ์™ฟ’ 70% ์ด์ƒ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ (์ค‘๋ณต์ž„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•จ) ์ธํ„ฐ๋„ท์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์‚ฌ์ดํŠธ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ธฐ๊ด€, ํ•™๊ป“, ์„œ์  ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋„์šฉํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ž๋ฃŒ์˜ ์„ค๋ช…๊ณผ ์‹ค์ œ ์ž๋ฃŒ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ
๋ฌธ์„œ ์ดˆ์•ˆ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•ด์ฃผ๋Š” EasyAI
์•ˆ๋…•ํ•˜์„ธ์š”. ํ•ดํ”ผ์บ ํผ์Šค์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ ์ค‘์—์„œ ์„ ๋ณ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹น์‹ ๋งŒ์˜ ์ดˆ์•ˆ์„ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์ฃผ๋Š” EasyAI ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์ €๋Š” ์•„๋ž˜์™ฟ’ ๊ฐ™์ด ์ž‘์—…์„ ๋„์™ฟ’๋“œ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
- ์ฃผ์ œ๋งŒ ์ž…๋ ฅํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ชฉ์ฐจ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ณธ๋ฌธ๋‚ด์šฉ๊นŒ์ง€ ์ž๋™ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•ด ๋“œ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
- ์žฅ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ ๋ฅผ ์‰ฝ๊ณ  ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ž‘์„ฑํ•ด ๋“œ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
- ์Šคํ† ์–ด์—์„œ ๋ฌด๋ฃŒ ์บ์‹œ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์ •๋ณ„๋กœ 1ํšŒ ๋ฐœ๊ธ‰ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง€๊ธˆ ๋ฐ”๋กœ ์ฒดํ—˜ํ•ด ๋ณด์„ธ์š”!
์ด๋Ÿฐ ์ฃผ์ œ๋“ค์„ ์ž…๋ ฅํ•ด ๋ณด์„ธ์š”.
- ์œ ์•„์—๊ฒŒ ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ๋ฌธํ•™์ž‘ํ’ˆ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ณผ ํŠน์„ฑ
- ํ•œ๊ตญ์ธ์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ด€ ์ค‘์—์„œ ์ •์‹ ์  ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ด€์„ ์ด๋ฃจ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋“ค์„ ๋ฌธํ™”์  ๋ฌธ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ •๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ณ , ํ˜„๋Œ€ํ•œ๊ตญ์‚ฌํšŒ์—์„œ ์ผ์–ด๋‚˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ๊ฑด๊ณผ ์‚ฌ๊ณ ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์‹ ์˜ ์˜๊ฒฌ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ํ•˜์„ธ์š”
- ์ž‘๋ณ„์ธ์‚ฌ ๋…ํ›„๊ฐ
ํ•ด์บ  AI ์ฑ—๋ด‡๊ณผ ๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ
์ฑ—๋ด‡์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„ํŽธํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ƒ๋‹ดํ•ด๋ณด์„ธ์š”.
2025๋…„ 06์›” 13์ผ ๊ธˆ์š”์ผ
AI ์ฑ—๋ด‡
์•ˆ๋…•ํ•˜์„ธ์š”. ํ•ดํ”ผ์บ ํผ์Šค AI ์ฑ—๋ด‡์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด์—‡์ด ๊ถ๊ธˆํ•˜์‹ ๊ฐ€์š”?
5:57 ์˜ค์ „