ĩ�ɱ���(1904~1992)? �W�gʷ? ???? ??? - �n��ʷ �W��? ???? ??? ??? (Colonialism historiography and the offbeat of Korean studies scholarship)

??? ĩ�ɱ���?? ???? ????? �W�g����ʷ? ?? ???? ????? ???? ??? ???? ?? ?? ??? ???? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ??.
ĩ��? ??? ??? ?? ? ??? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ??? ?????, ??? ???? ??? ?? ?? ?? ???? ?? ?? ??????. ?? ??? ?? ??? ???? ??? ??? ????? ??? ??? ???? ?????. ??? ???? ???????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ???? ?? ??? ??? ???. ?? ?? ?? ????? ????? ??? ??? ????? ???? ????? ???? ???. ??? ??? ???? ?? ??? ? ?? ??? ?? ??? ???? ??? ????, ??? ??? ???? ???? ?????. ? ? �������d��ʷ��(1949)? ?? ???? ?????.
??? ???? ???? ???????? ???? ĩ��?? ����? ??? ��͢? ??? ???? ??? ? ???? �ȵ�? ���L? ????. ????? ??? ??? ���? ??? ????? ??? ??? ?? ? ?? ????. ??? ??? ? ??? ĩ��? ??? ???? ??? ?? ??? ?? ???? ???? ? ????? ���@? ���C?? ???? ??? ??, ??? �n��? ??��??? ??? ??? ??? ???? ֲ��? ��ֲ�� �P�S? ??? ?????. ?? ����ʷ ??? ??? ?????? ĩ��? ??? ???? ??? ??????. ??? ?? ??? ???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ??????. ĩ��? 50?? ??? ??? �M�rʷ�wϵ? ??? ?????, ??? ??? ??? ??? ?? ????? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??? ??? ???. ?? ??? ?? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ????? ????? ???? ??? ????.
??? ??? ???? ??? ??? ???? ???. �o֪??? �ر�?? ????. ?? ??? ??? ??? ?? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ??? ??? ???? ???. ??? ??? ??? ?? ? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ???? ??? ??? ? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??? ? ???. ??? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ???? ??? ??? ????? ??? ?? ��??? ??��? ??? ??? ???.

This paper traces the academic life history of colonialism historian Suematsu Kasukazu with the goal to identify what colonialism historiography is and why an offbeat attitude towards Suematsu Kasukazu developed in the Korean studies academic community.
Younger scholars in Korea and Japan did not seek to change the prewar and postwar views of Suematsu Kasukazu (1904~1992). They ignored or avoided them. In particular, the Korean studies academia only focused on the methodology to explain colonialism historiography through substantiation and did not pay attention to the attitudes and conditions of existence. Therefore, as the Korean studies academia criticized colonialism historiography as a matter of substantiation vs. substantiation and found a solution to overcome it, it could not reveal the real truth hidden in substantiation. Rather, there was a tendency to fall into the ��great paradox��, which justifies the phenomenon of isolation of the academic world and proves how outstandingly colonialism historiography reflects the interests of the empire.