??? ? ?? ??/??? ??? ?? - ???? <??>? ???? (How to Draw a Future/city That You Can Not Think of)

? ???? 2000??? ????? ???? ¡º??¡»(2006, ??)? ??? ??/??? ???? ????? ??. ??? ??? ???? ??? ?? ???? ? ? ??? ???? ?? ?? ? ???? ??? ????. ???? ????? ???? ?? ??? ??? ???? ¡®??¡¯?? ??? ??? ?? ¡®??? ??¡¯? ¡®?-??¡¯? ?????. ?-??? ??? ??, ???? ??, ??? ???? ??? ???? ?? ??? ¡®???? ??¡¯? ? ? ?? ?? ??? ????? ????. ¡®?-??¡¯? ??? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???, ??? ¡®?-??¡¯? ???? ¡®??? ??¡¯? ??? ??? ?? ??? ??/??? ??? ?? ???? ??. ?-??? ?? ? ??? ????? ?? ???? ??? ?? ? ????. ? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ?? ??? ??, ???? ????. ? ???? ¡º??¡»? ??? ????? ¡®??/??¡¯? ??? ?? ???? ???? ??? ?? ?????. ¡º??¡»? ?? ??? ??? ??? ?? ?-??? ? ??? ??? ????. ?-????? ??? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ?? ??? ?????? ?????? ????. ??? ?? ???? ????? ??? ???? ??? ? ??? ???? ???? ????. ? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ?? ???? ???? ????. ?? ? ??? ??? ???? ???? ???? ? ???? ????? ???. ¡º??¡»? ??? ????? ?? ?? ? ?-??? ? ??? ¡®??? ??¡¯? ???? ??????? ?? ????? ???? ??.

In this article, Minkyu Park's Ping Pong (2006, Changbi) is analyzed from the view of urban place and space. Among the many researchers who attempted to theorize place and space, the theories of Michel de Certeau and Marc Aug¨¦ have been used in this article. Marc Aug¨¦, who is based on Certeau's space theory, distinguished the 'space' of Certeau as 'anthropological places' and 'non-places'. Non-places refers to specific areas of a modern city that can not be 'anthropological places', characterized by the absence of a relationship, the absence of history, and the absence of a unique identity. Using the concept of non-places Aug¨¦ reflected the condition in which modern people have to stay in 'permanent present'. With non-place, it is the empty space that has paid attention to the public space of the modern city in this article. The empty space is a space of residual space, meaninglessness that deviates from the principle of functional rationality.The 'place/space' of the modern city in this novel is linked to the imagination for the future. School and fields as the main stage in Ping Pong, shows respectively the characteristics of non-places and the empty spaces. The school as a non-places means that the pathology of public spaces in contemporary cities has now extended to all generations. Empty spaces, a product of functional rationality in all areas of the city, are a useless and meaningless spaces. The field as an empty spaces gradually transformed from a place of alienation to a space of fantasy. This shows the subversive possibilities of empty spaces, but the possibilities are not maximized. The public spaces in this novel, the non - places and the empty spaces, shows a summary of life in the modern city where 'the cognitive mapping¡¯ is impossible.