���Z�o�� ?? ���xʽ �h���Z �x�� (The Study of Idu[���x]-type Sino-Korean in Korean Dictionary)

�� �x��? ���Z�o�� ?? �h���Z? ??? ���xʽ �h���Z? ?? ����?? ???? ?? ?? Փ�h? ���? ????? ???? ?? ��? ?? ????? ? ???. �F��? ���Z�o��? ?? ?? �h���Z ���}�Z ??? ??? ���y �h���Z? ���xʽ �h���Z? �Ї�?? ����? �h���Z? �ձ�?? ����? �h���Z? ���x�Z? ??? ��?? ??. ��??(����)��, ��??(׷��)��, ��??(��ˢ)��, ��??(����)�� ?? ??? ���Z??? �� �x��??? ??? ͬ�����h�Z? ?? ���}�Z? ?? ��Ҫ? ??? ����???. ?? �����ߡ�? ?? Փ�h??? ���x ��̎�ɡ�? �x��? ��*???/*???��??? ?? ?? Փ�h???. ?? ?? ���xʽ �h���Z? ??? �����Z? ��ͬ? ??? ? ���Z�o��? ���d? ���Z?? ?? ��??(����)~??��, ��??(����)~???��, ��????�� ?? ��? ?? �f��??? ???.

This paper is aim to research Idu[���x]-type Sino-Korean included in Sino-Korean of Korean Dictionary through several examples which were not sufficiently discussed. In current Korean dictionary, Korean traditional Sino-Korean, Idu[���x]-type Sino-Korean are explained as polysemy with Sino-Koreans that were from China or Japan. Jakja(����)', ��chugo (׷��)', ��chuswae(��ˢ)', ��docheok(����)' are those words, and this study showed these are homonym in Korean Dictionary entry, so they can be listed as head words. Especially discussing about Jakja(����)', it was emphasized that Idu[���x], ceogan[����]'s reading should be ��*Barragan/*barahan'. Also Idu[���x]-type Sino-Korean such as ��aemae [����] ~ aemae[??]', ��andam[����] ~ andami[???]��, ��andalbokdal [????],�� etc. which were listed in Korean dictionary and occurred confusion with Korean native language were explained. Furthermore, in this study that also typical words of Sino-Korean was listed in Korean Dictionary included in the Korean Idu[���x]-type Sino-Korean that was to show through ��eopu[ҵ��], eopmu[ҵ��], junggi[�ؼ�]' such as example.