????? ???? ��????????��? ??? ?? ?? (A Comparative Study of Sino-Korean between Songgwang Temple Edition and Seobong Temple Edition of Chobalsimjaggyeongmun-eonhea)

? ??? ??? ????? ???? ��????????��? ??? ??? ???? ? ??? ??? ??? ?? ?? ??. ?? ?? ????? ? ??? ???? ???? ?? ��?��?? ??, ????, ��?/?�� ??? ??, ������? ??, ???? ???, ?? ??? ??? ??? ??��?????. ??, ????? ?? ???? ??? ????? ????? ??? ????? ?? ?????, ??? ?? ??? ???. ??? ??????? ???? ???? ?? ��?��? ??? ??? ??? ???, ?????? ��?/?��? ????? ������? ��?��? ????. ????? ????? ??????? ?????? ? ????, ??? ?? ???? ??? ��j��? ??/???? ???? ?????, ??????? ??? ??? ??? ?????. ?? ????? �ࡤ��ĸ? ��ĸ? ??? ????? ?? ????? ??? ??? ????, ????? ��ĸ?? ??? ��j��? ?? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ��?��?? ???? ??? ???.

The purpose of this study is to compare the Sino-Korean of the Songgwang Temple edition and the Seobong Temple edition of Chobalsimjaggyeongmun-eonhea(���l���Ծ����V��) to understand the differences. To this end, this study compares Sino-Korean in the two editions by dividing them into a combination of '?', ?-palatalization, confusion in '?/?' notation, '��', aspirated and unaspirated sounds, and others. First, as a whole, the Seobong Temple edition published in the Gyeonggi area shows a more normative and refined notation than the Songgwang Temple edition published in Jeolla-do. In the Seobong Temple edition, the Sino-Korean is not used in combination with particle '?', and the '��', which was written as ��beu/beul�� in the Songgwang Temple edition, is unified as ��beul��. Regarding palatalization, ?-palatalization, its overcorrection, and the phenomenon of dropping/adding the semi-vowel 'j' under the dental sound appear in the Songgwang Temple edition, but these were all replaced with normative sounds in the Seobong Temple edition. In addition, the notation '?/?' tends to follow the notation principles of �ࡤ��ĸ and ��ĸ in the Seobong Temple edition compared to the Songgwang Temple edition. However, in ��ĸ, Sino-Korean with a semi-vowel 'j' tends to appear as '?' in the Seobong Temple edition because the initial law is applied.