?? ??? ???? ??? ?? - ??? ¡º???? ?? ???¡»? ?? ??? ???? - (A Male Subject's Shame and the Whereabouts of Ethics: Focusing on Female Representation in Lee, Cheong-jun's "Unwritten Autobiography")

???? ¡º???? ?? ???¡»? ¡º???¡»?? ???? ?? ?? ??? ???? ???? ???? ??? ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ??? ¡º???¡»?? ¡º??¡»?? ???? ??? ??? ????. ? ??? ?? ??? ??? ?? ??? ???? ??? ??? ????? ???? ????. ??? ?? ??? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ??? ????? ??, ??? ????? ?? ???(??)? ?? ?? ??? ???? ??? ??? ??? ???? ?????.
???? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ?????, ????? 5.16 ??? ???? ???? ??? ???? ??? ?????. ?? ??? ?? ??? ?? ???? ??? ????? ??? ??? ?? ??? ??? ???? ???? ?? ???? ????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ???? ??? ???, ?? ??? ???? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ???. ?? ??? ??? ??? ???? ?? ? ??? ??? ??? ????? ?????, ? ??? ?? ??? ???? ??? ??? 4.19??? ?? ???? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???? ???? ???.

Lee, Cheong-jun's "Unwritten Autobiography" is an autobiographical narrative about the author's situation before and after starting his literary career. The story covers 10-days in the life of the narrator, who has been a journalist for a woman's magazine and submits a resignation letter, then ponders whether to return to work. This paper focuses on the relationship between the male subject's anxiety and shame with regards to female college students.
The area around the women's university is an allegory of the reality for the time:, the female university students are a representation of luxury. The narrator feels ashamed that he cannot be free in a feminized society, and suffers anxiety due to the crisis of establishing a subject. He tries to prove his completeness by attacking female university students. In addition, the problem is that negative social phenomena-such as dividendism and snobism brought about by the development economy after the coup in May 1961-converged with the luxury enjoyed by female university students. The shame of male subjects at this time therefore corresponds to narcissism.
For the author, literature was something ethical, that set him apart from the world of snobs, but on the other hand, it was ambivalent because it became a means of survival in the post-May 1961 world. At this time, the subject's ethics are secured when standing against female university students and the masses, and the new literary subject implies elitism and strong male solidarity. In the end, the literary orientation of the writer is set, representing the limitations of Lee, Chung-jun's literature as representative of the 4.19 generation.