테이트왿� 배리의 리어왕

· 에르빈 파노프스키. 파노프스키의 이데아. 마순자 역. 예경. 2005.
· 아르놀트 하우저. 문학과 예술의 사회사. 염무웅, 반성완 역. 창비. 2005.
· 한영림. 셰익스피어 공연 무대사: 글로브 극장에서 글로벌 극장으로 . 동인, 2007.
· Butlin, Martin. "Introduction", The Painted Word: British History Painting 1750-1830. Peter Cannon-Brookes ed. New York: Boydell Press, 1991, 7-8.
· Gordon, Scott Paul. "Reading Patriot Art: James Barry`s King Lear" Eighteenth-Century Studies 36.4, 491-509.
· Martineau, Jane et al. eds. Shakespeare in art. London: Merrel, 2003.
· Messina, Maria Grazia. "Shakespeare and the sublime", Shakespeare in Art. eds. Jane Martineau et al. London: Merrel, 2003. 61-63.
· Johnson, Samuel. "Notes on Shakespeare`s plays: King Lear", Johnson on Shakespeare. Vol.2, ed. Arthur Sherbo. New Haven: Yale UP, 1968, 704.
· Paulson, Ronald. Book and Painting. Knoxville: U Tennessee P, 1982.
· Shakespeare, William. King Lear. London: Penguin, 1994.
· Sillars, Stuart. Painting Shakespeare. Cambridge UP, 2006.
· Tate, Nahum. The History of King Lear. London: Cornmarket, 1969.
· 영문제목
· Abstract (영문이름)
· Nahum Tate`s History of King Lear replaced Shakespeare`s King Lear on the England stage from 1681 to 1838. Tate adapted Shakespeare`s play severely according to the contemporary aesthetic sensibility. He restores Lear to his throne and makes Cordelia marry Edgar. By adapting like that, Tate tactfully avoided the abdication motif. Scott Paul Gordon suggests that Tate`s Lear satisfies not only an aesthetic sensibility but also a political preference for orderly succession of the Restoration audience.
· On the other hands, James Barry who was a rebel against the art system of England challenged the contemporary political tendency as well as the artistic sensibility. He was expelled from the Royal Academy in 1799 because he severely charged his fellow artists on flattering patrons with their portraits instead of devoting themselves to history painting. He attributed the cause of stagnation of history paintings in England to the monarchy and then became a patriotic republican.
· He drew two paintings of Lear which represented the final scene of Shakespeare`s play, not Tate`s adaptation. Barry`s paintings of Lear reveal his political view showing a monarch`s fall and the emergence of republican order. He delivers such a narrative through composition and stylistic codes. Barry pushed Lear weeping over the dead Cordelia to one side and put Edgar and Albany at the center. By using such composition Barry made the heroes of the new generation replace the old monarch Lear. Besides, he represented Edgar and Albany in Neo-classical style and Lear in manneristic style. Through the contrast of still young men and extravagantly overwhelmed Lear Barry made the shift of power natural and appropriate.
· Tate`s adaptation and Barry`s paintings of Lear show how this play was represented to express the different political views in the complicated and sophisticated political circumstances of the seventeenth and eighteenth century. Nowadays, Shakespeare is still alive by being interpreted and adapted newly in accordance with a new social context.